Contact



Add ShazzerSpeak








Let Shazz stalk you by e-mail!

Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz
««Nov 2009»»
SMTWTFS
1
2
3
45
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1314
15
16
1718
19
20
21
22
23
2425262728
2930

Random Blasts from the Past

Powered by Stuff-a-Blog

The Place

City of Malmo

The Pictures

www.flickr.com
This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from ShazzerSpeak. Make your own badge here.

The Tweets

    The Sponsors




    The Headcount

    Total: 1,806,250
    since: 3 Dec 2004

    Daily Reads

    The Call

    this is a Proud Liberal Site Site Meter Free counter and web stats

    Blog Status

    • 4 yrs 51 wks 0 days old
    • Updated: 24 Nov 2009
    • 1,185 entries
    • 1,153 comments

    Legal Stuff

    Creative Commons License

    Original ShazzerSpeak content is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

     Subscribe in a reader


    Powered by FeedBurner

    Sweden copies U.S. TV shows badly

    posted Friday, 5 October 2007

    Dr. Darling and I decided we'd give the Swedish version of "American Idol" a shot this season, even though past experience indicated that we'd be disappointed.

    Swedish television makes regular attempts to duplicate US and British reality-style programs and usually misses the mark...most often because they can't or won't commit to the kind of production budget necessary to do them right.  I mean, re-arranging the furniture and slapping up a coat of paint does not an Extreme Home Makeover make.  Even Swedes themselves hated the localized version of "Queer Eye for the Straight Guy"... it barely lasted one season.

    Swedish Idol, on the other hand, is very popular even though American Idol is also aired here (several weeks behind the actual competition) and therefore can be directly compared. But it's pretty tough to screw up a singing contest and Sweden has a well-deserved reputation for producing excellent vocalists. Plus, the country is small enough that it's not unusual to know someone who actually knows one of the contestants.

    The main reason we hadn't checked the show out earlier was the language.  Because the competition phase is always a live broadcast, there are no Swedish subtitles available via text tv, and I just didn't want to work that hard to follow it. This year I figured my Swedish was up to the challenge, plus the show is airing at a time when we aren't watching anything else.

    The audition phase was fairly entertaining, as was "Stockholm Week", but when it came time for the top 16 contestants to begin singing in front of a live audience, it went very quickly downhill. The format here has them singing every other night during the first week or so...which means there's not a lot of rehearsal time and it shows.

    The girls do seem to have plenty of time to have their hair done, however, because several of them have been clipped and coloured to the point that they're barely recognizable from their earlier appearances, and the results have not necessarily been an improvement. I also suspect that the contestants don't have all that many options when choosing what to sing, because song selection has been consistently crappy. (I'm no expert, but I'm fairly certain that Soft Cell's "Tainted Love" is not a good tune for showing off a male singer's vocal range, let alone a female's.)

    The taped interview montage that runs before each contestant's performances always show him or her working out with a choreographer, but we have yet to see any of them do any kind of dancing. And the judging seems so be all over the map. I've seen a number of decent vocal performances ignored because the contestant didn't project enough energy or flare, and just as many mediocre vocals praised as though they were worthy of a Grammy, all because the singer "looks like a star."

    Now the show has reached the stage where it's only on once a week, and we were hopeful that this would mean the performances would improve. But tonight's show failed to impress either myself or the Swede ("Tainted Love" was actually one of the better numbers) and I doubt we'll tune in again. We gave it the old college try, but it's just too lame to invest any more time in. At least now my excuse for not watching it is something other than "I'm too lazy to deal with the Swedish."

    tags:    

    links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit

    AddThis Social Bookmark Button




    1. Susie left...
    Monday, 8 October 2007 7:46 am :: http://susieswe.blogspot.com

    I'm from Finland, but sometimes watch Swedish shows, because of my mother language being Swedish. I seldomly watch those copied shows, neither the Finnish nor Swedish versions, because they are usually pretty lame. What I would like to see though is an european version of American Idol. We have the Eurovision song contest, but that is not the same thing.


    2. Shazzer left...
    Monday, 8 October 2007 6:43 pm

    True. The Eurovision Song Contest is a totally different animal. Aren't most of the performers professional? One thing that might prevent a "European Idol" from being successful would be the cost of voting by phone. Audience participation is key to the whole concept, and the cost of a quick call or SMS can vary widely from country to country.


    3. Susie left...
    Wednesday, 10 October 2007 7:12 pm :: http://susieswe.blogspot.com

    Most of the performers in the European song contest are professionals. Well, I haven't watched the contest for years, but I think there is a voting system by mobile phone, so it should work for an "European Idols" too.


    4. Peter left...
    Friday, 12 October 2007 1:47 pm

    I agree with you that swedish Idol is crap, but I'm pretty sure American Idol is itself a copy of the original english Pop Idol.


    5. Shazzer left...
    Friday, 12 October 2007 2:42 pm

    You're absolutely right Peter. The Idol franchise started in the UK, but I don't think the UK show has ever been broadcast here in Vikingland...which is why I sort of implied that Sweden was trying (and failing) to copy the American version.